.svg)
A compensation review is a critical process undertaken by organizations to ensure that their salary structures and benefits packages remain competitive, fair, and aligned with their strategic objectives. This process involves a thorough analysis of various factors including market trends, internal equity, employee performance, and organizational budget constraints.
A compensation review is a formal process conducted by organizations to evaluate employee pay and benefits in relation to several factors. It's essentially a health check to ensure salaries and benefits packages remain fair, competitive, and aligned with both employee performance and market trends.
Here's a closer look at the key purposes of a compensation review:
Ensure internal equity
Maintain external competitiveness
Align compensation with performance
Budget Management and Cost Control
Compensation reviews help organizations make informed decisions about salary budgets and overall compensation costs. By analyzing data, they can identify areas for potential adjustments or cost-saving measures while ensuring competitiveness.
Compliance with labor laws
Compensation reviews help organizations ensure they are adhering to relevant labor laws and regulations regarding minimum wage, equal pay for equal work, and other pay equity requirements.
Here's how it fits into the bigger picture:
1. Menarik dan mengekalkan bakat
A well-designed compensation review process helps establish competitive pay and benefits packages. This is crucial for attracting qualified candidates during recruitment and retaining valuable employees over time. Competitive compensation demonstrates the organization values its workforce and helps win the war for talent in a competitive job market.
2. Employee motivation and engagement
Regular compensation reviews that ensure fair pay and reward strong performance contribute to a more motivated and engaged workforce. Employees feel valued and appreciated when their contributions are recognized through competitive compensation. This fosters a positive work environment and reduces turnover.
3. Alignment with organizational goals
Compensation reviews inform strategic talent management decisions. By identifying high performers and aligning compensation with performance, organizations can invest in developing their top talent and ensure they retain the skills and expertise needed to achieve organizational goals.
4. Supporting a positive work culture
Regular compensation reviews that promote internal pay equity and transparency contribute to a more positive and trusting work culture. Employees feel they are being treated fairly and have opportunities for advancement based on performance. This reduces feelings of resentment or unfair treatment and fosters a more collaborative work environment.
5. Compliance and risk management
Compensation reviews help ensure the organization remains compliant with labor laws and regulations regarding minimum wage, equal pay, and other pay equity requirements. This mitigates potential legal risks and financial penalties associated with non-compliance.
6. Data-driven HR decisions:
The data gathered during compensation reviews provides valuable insights to inform the overall HR strategy. This data can be used to identify trends, adjust compensation structures, and make data-driven decisions about future talent acquisition, development, and retention strategies.
The frequency of compensation reviews can vary depending on several factors, but there are some general guidelines and best practices to consider:
Common review cadence
Many organizations conduct a formal compensation review on an annual basis. This allows for a comprehensive evaluation of employee performance, market data, and internal pay equity. It provides a predictable cycle for adjustments and ensures compensation remains competitive over time.
Some companies opt for biannual reviews, offering a midpoint check-in alongside the annual review. This can be particularly relevant in fast-paced industries where market conditions or job requirements can change more rapidly.
Circumstances warranting a review
If there are substantial changes in industry benchmarks or compensation trends within the relevant geographic location, a compensation review may be necessary outside the typical cycle. This ensures the organization remains competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
Mergers and acquisitions can disrupt compensation structures. A review may be needed to integrate different pay scales and ensure fairness across the newly combined workforce.
If the organization experiences significant budgetary changes, a compensation review may be conducted to assess the feasibility of planned salary increases or adjust compensation structures accordingly.
High employee turnover, particularly among top performers, can be a signal that compensation is no longer competitive. A review can help identify and address any pay discrepancies that might be contributing to employee departures.
Pertimbangan tambahan
Startups and rapidly growing companies may need more frequent reviews to keep pace with their own growth and the evolving market.
Certain industries are known for more frequent compensation adjustments. It's important to consider industry norms when determining review frequency.
Employee surveys or focus groups can provide valuable insights into employee sentiment regarding compensation. If concerns are widespread, a review may be warranted even outside the standard cycle.
Here are some key best practices for conducting a successful compensation review:
1. Preparation and planning:
2. Komunikasi dan ketelusan:
3. Conducting the review:
4. Communication of outcomes:
5. Additional best practices:
The people involved in the compensation review process typically vary depending on the organization's size and structure. Here's a breakdown of the key players:
(A) Core participants:
1, HR department: They play a central role in the entire process. HR responsibilities include:
2. Managers: Direct supervisors play a crucial role in evaluating employee performance and providing recommendations for compensation adjustments. Their responsibilities include:
(B) Additional participants (Depending on Organization Size):
3. Compensation and benefits committee: In larger organizations, a dedicated committee composed of senior leaders from HR, finance, and various business units may be established. This committee:
4. Finance department: Finance plays a crucial role in ensuring compensation decisions align with the organization's budget. Their responsibilities may include:
5. Legal Department: The legal department may be involved in ensuring compliance with labor laws and regulations regarding equal pay and minimum wage.
6. Optional Participants:
Yes, compensation reviews are particularly critical in certain industries due to the nature of the work, talent market dynamics, and the potential for rapid changes. Here are some examples:
1. Industries with High Talent Demand and Competitive Salaries:
2. Industries with Project-Based Work and Specialized Skills:
3. Industri lain:
Ini ialah tinjauan ringkas yang boleh dihantar dengan kerap untuk menyemak pendapat pekerja anda tentang sesuatu isu dengan cepat. Tinjauan ini terdiri daripada kurang soalan (tidak lebih daripada 10) untuk mendapatkan maklumat dengan cepat. Ini boleh ditadbir secara berkala (bulanan / mingguan / suku tahunan).
Mengadakan mesyuarat berkala selama sejam untuk sembang tidak formal dengan setiap ahli pasukan adalah cara terbaik untuk memahami apa yang berlaku dengan mereka. Oleh kerana ia adalah perbualan yang selamat dan peribadi, ia membantu anda mendapatkan butiran yang lebih baik mengenai sesuatu isu.
eNPS (pekerja skor Net Promoter) adalah salah satu cara yang paling mudah tetapi berkesan untuk menilai pendapat pekerja anda terhadap syarikat anda. Ia termasuk satu soalan menarik yang mengukur kesetiaan. Contoh soalan eNPS termasuk: Bagaimana kemungkinan anda mengesyorkan syarikat kami kepada orang lain? Pekerja bertindak balas terhadap kaji selidik eNPS pada skala 1-10, di mana 10 menandakan mereka 'berkemungkinan besar' untuk mengesyorkan syarikat dan 1 menandakan mereka 'sangat tidak mungkin' untuk mengesyorkannya.
